|
|
|
IN THIS
ISSUE... - Nevada Proposes
Comprehensive, Independent Testing Program for Casks Designed to Deliver
Nuclear Waste to Yucca Mountain - Laboratory Experiments: Metal Alloy
Nuclear Waste Containers Will Dissolve
Nevada Proposes
Comprehensive, Independent Testing Program for Casks Designed to Deliver
Nuclear Waste to Yucca Mountain
Citing serious credibility problems associated with past federal
government-sponsored tests of casks being developed to deliver high-level
nuclear waste to the proposed Yucca Mountain repository, the State of
Nevada Nuclear Projects Agency recently asked U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Chairman Richard Meserve to consider Nevada’s proposal on how
to carry out a series of independent tests to oversee and verify the
government’s previous findings.
In a
letter to Meserve, agency Executive Director Bob Loux said the state
believes that “comprehensive full-scale testing would not only demonstrate
compliance with NRC performance standards, it would improve the overall
safety of the cask and vehicle system and generally enhance confidence in
both qualitative and probabilistic risk and analysis techniques.”
Loux also wrote that the tests could increase public and state and
local government acceptance of the shipments, and could reduce adverse
social and economic impacts caused by current public perceptions of the
risks of transporting the nation’s high-level nuclear waste to Yucca
Mountain, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Nevada is
proposing a four-pronged approach to the full-scale certification testing:
meaningful stakeholder participation in development of testing protocols
and selection of test facilities and personnel; full-scale physical
testing, including sequential drops of casks, fire, puncture, and
immersion, prior to NRC certification; additional computer simulations to
determine performance in extra-regulatory accidents and to determine
failure thresholds; and, reevaluation of previous risk study findings and,
if appropriate, revisions of NRC cask performance standards.
Loux said Nevada also considers destructive testing of a randomly
selected production cask to be a highly desirable way of ascertaining
actual failure thresholds.
Nevada in 1999 requested a comprehensive assessment of the affects
of three types of terrorist attacks and sabotage on waste casks: attacks
against transportation infrastructure used by nuclear waste shipments,
attacks involving the capture of a nuclear waste shipment and use of
high-energy explosives against the cask, and direct attacks on a cask
using anti-tank missiles. As part of that request, Nevada also
recommended that the NRC consider the need for physical testing on
full-scale or scale models of casks to evaluate weapons capabilities, cask
vulnerability to attack with high-energy explosive and the response of
spent nuclear fuel to such attacks.
However, Loux said the NRC has yet to take any action on Nevada’s
recommendation, “despite the added urgency brought about by the events of
Sept. 11 and their implications for potential terrorism against spent fuel
and/or high-level waste shipments.”
Loux added that during the preliminary phase of the NRC’s Package
Performance Study, conducted in 1999 and 2000, the NRC repeatedly
acknowledged the importance of establishing stakeholder confidence in the
PPS study process and its findings. However, the NRC has yet to
release the draft PPS testing protocol for public review and comments, as
it promised in summer 2002, nor has the NRC rescheduled the promised PPS
public meetings in Nevada, originally planned for August and September,
2002.
“The process to date does not inspire confidence, nor does it come
close to meeting NRC-stated commitments to public and stakeholder
involvement in developing and review of testing protocols,” Loux
said.
Laboratory Experiments: Metal Alloy Nuclear Waste Containers Will
Dissolve Scientists working for the State of Nevada recently told the
National Academy of Sciences’ Board of Radioactive Waste Management that
metal alloy containers designed to hold high-level nuclear waste at Yucca
Mountain will in time dissolve under certain conditions.
Dr. Roger Staehle and Dr. Don Shettel conducted the experiments at
Catholic University using conditions simulating those anticipated at Yucca
Mountain. They told the board that given the natural conditions
found at Yucca Mountain – including moisture and heat – manmade metal
alloy containers cannot safely hold high-level nuclear waste for the
required regulatory period, but in time will dissolve.
“These findings reinforce our belief that the U.S. Department of
Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission have long used fuzzy science
to prop up their plans to dump the nation’s nuclear waste in Nevada,” said
Loux. “Once again, the scientific facts are proving the fallacy of
DOE’s assertion that Yucca Mountain is safe for the long-term storage of
nuclear waste.”
A critical
element of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository is an engineered barrier
system incorporating nuclear waste canisters composed of C-22 Hastelloy
and a drip shield made of titanium-7 metal. The drip shield is designed to
divert any water seepage and prevent it from reaching the waste
canisters.
Dr. Staehle and Dr. Shettel have been conducting
laboratory experiments to assess the stability of the two key barrier
metals, C-22 and Ti-7, under anticipated repository conditions. These
conditions include rock dust and precipitates covering the drip shield and
hot canisters; fracture and rock-pore water dripping and flowing;
microbial/fungal reactions; and man-made intrusive materials.
Using
simulated Yucca Mountain pore water, Dr. Staehle’s and Dr. Shettel’s
experiments strongly suggest that heating in the repository will produce a
powerful acid vapor called aqua regia, which is so potent it even
dissolves gold. As this caustic vapor condenses and evaporates,
concentrated acid and solid precipitates form. The solid precipitates in
turn attract water vapor from the air and form additional very strong
acids. Under these conditions, at temperatures ranging from 70 degrees
Celsius (158 degrees Fahrenheit) to 145 C (293 F), the engineered-barrier
metals C-22 and Ti-7 dissolve.
The scientists’ findings just add to
the list of problems with C-22 and Ti-7. Previously, laboratory
results showed that lead, mercury, fluorine, and possibly other trace
elements in the water and rock of Yucca Mountain would hinder the ability
of C-22 and Ti-7 to contain the nuclear wastes for the required period of
time.
|
Outrage of the
Week
Yucca
Mountain project spokesman Alan Benson, responding recently to finds of
State of Nevada researchers that the canisters DOE is designing to hold
spent fuel and high level radioactive waste in a Yucca Mountain repository
are subject to severe and rapid corrosion, was quoted as saying that "no
decision has been made about what type of alloy to use for the
casks."
Such an
admission is not only remarkable, but it is also reflective of the
disingenuous and misleading information DOE used to convince Congress last
summer that Yucca Mountain should be approved as a repository
location.
Because DOE
has been forced to acknowledge that the geology at Yucca Mountain is so
porous it can't, by itself, keep deadly radioactive waste from reaching
the accessible environment, DOE proposes to use exotic waste disposal
containers that will have to be able to withstand corrosion - and every
other form of natural process and event - for 10,000 years or more.
To do this, DOE settled on an unproven metal alloy known as C-22 for the
waste canisters, and boldly touted the material's durability.
The problem is, DOE never did
the studies to determine if the metal would, in fact, perform as
advertised. When Nevada scientists conducted the
research, it became apparent very rapidly that C-22 (as well as the
titanium proposed to be used for drip shields over each of the waste
containers) would corrode quickly when exposed to water with the chemical
make up of that found underground at Yucca Mountain.
In light of
this finding, DOE's spin doctors are now saying that the State's findings
are not important because DOE hasn't decided what metal the waste disposal
packages will be made from. Well, if alloys as highly touted as C-22
and as durable used as titanium won't do the job, it's hard to imagine any
metal that is going to last 10,000 years.
More
disturbing, Benson's admission means that DOE's entire basis for using
Yucca Mountain suitable as a repository is negated. The only way DOE
could assert that waste disposed of at Yucca Mountain would remain
isolated from the environment was to create the myth of 10,000 year waste
containers. Admitting that DOE hasn't a clue about how to make the
containers last that long is paramount to admitting the entire Yucca
Mountain program is a scam.
We
welcome comments and story ideas for this newsletter. For media
information, please contact Tom Bradley, Brown & Partners, at
(702) 967-2222 or via e-mail at tbradley@brown-partners.com.
For a
text-only version of this newsletter, please contact tbradley@brown-partners.com
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this newsletter, please
e-mail nwpo@nuc.state.nv.us.
Do not reply to this e-mail.
|